Mahler's 6th Symphony caught my attention a while back when
Alex
Ross mentioned the big box constructed especially for the
Redwood Symphony,
to be used in the symphony's final movement. Something in Alex's
description moved me, especially when he wrote "to produce the famous
hammer blows in Mahler's Sixth, the orchestra deployed a large wooden
box that matched Mahler's original specifications."
Oooh, that got the latent speculative fiction author in me thinking.
The resulting story is still gestating and will continue to do so for a
while, as fiction writing is my third-ranked hobby (after composing and
bread baking) but I may finish the thing eventually. Meanwhile I am
loathe to give away all the details, but I'll mention that the story
will feature a black hole, a skeleton orchestra sawing away on their
violins with femurs--or something--and will definitively explain why
Mahler was never comfortable with that last thud at the end of the
fourth movement.
The thud whereof I speak is one of three (later revised to two) thuds
Mahler specified in his score. He did not, however, specify the means,
asking only that the sound be loud but dull, and non-metallic, "like
the stroke of an ax." They were meant to be three blows that fate
delivers on the heroic protagonist of the symphony. Alma Mahler
famously described these blows as prophetically depicting Gustav's own
coming disasters: the death of his daughter; his forced resignation
from the Vienna opera; and the diagnosis of his (eventually fatal)
heart condition. (Keep in mind that, for whatever reason, almost
anything Alma has said about Gustav and his music is generally treated
as dubious. And one critic has pointed out her oversight in mentioning
another hammer blow of fate: her own infidelity.) Various orchestras
have devised ingenious devices--usually big wooden boxes or giant bass
drums--of varying thuddiness in an attempt to carry out the composer's
wishes. Mahler himself was doomed to frustration with his thudders,
never finding a satisfying instrument.
For more information on Mahler's 6th and its tripartite thuddiness, do
listen to
Benjamin
Zander's superb analysis of the four movements, and his decision to
restore the 3rd thud in the recording he made with the Boston Phil.
(The mp3s are available at the link; I'm told the files of the symphony
itself are low-res, but those of the discussion disc are crystal clear,
and feature the most awesome,
phattest thuds imaginable.)
Meanwhile,
Ionarts
has a good comparison of the various recordings of
No. 6.
I've enjoyed Iván Fischer's Budapest recording, even though he chooses
Mahler's second (and final, apparently) thoughts on both the thud
numbering (only two) and the ordering of the middle movements (Andante,
then Scherzo). I lean heavily toward Mahler's original concept,
although I'm hardly ready to call myself an expert on the work. (I can
say I also bought Lenny Bernstein's reading as a bargain from Amazon,
but the recording seems veiled; perhaps a failing of the original
engineers, or a mistake in conversion to a compressed file format.)
Finally, let me leave you with a quote from David Hurwitz, writing in
The
Mahler Symphonies: An Owner's Manual: "There has been more nonsense
written about this symphony [no. 6] than any other work by Mahler." As
I sketch the outline of my story, to be titled
Mahler's Box, I
can't tell you how much I am looking forward to this opportunity to
contribute yet more nonsense to the pile.
Labels: Composer, Fiction, Spooky